Back to Home
 Affiliated with PerformanceAssessment.Org Contact us at info@timeoutfromtesting.org


  Updated August



 Time Out...
Articles - 4 new!
Testimonies
Press Releases
Data and Charts
Article Archives

 Responses to
NYC School
Reorganization

Response to Klein
City Resolution
Garodnick Letter
Disastrous Reforms
Improving Schools

 DOE's New
Testing Plan

K-2, 8th retention
What's the plan?
Get the facts
Testing definitions
What DOE says
DOE Survey
CPE Letter to Klein

 Regents Review
Panel

Reports & Reviews
Panel Bios

 3rd Grade
Retention Policy

What it is
Articles
Documents
Take Action!
Testimonies

 About Time Out
    From Testing:

Mission
Timeline
Bios


Parents Flunk Mike's No-Promotion Plan

February 11, 2004 | By CARL CAMPANILE and DAVID SEIFMAN | NY Post

The city's largest parents group has joined the revolt against Mayor Bloomberg's new policy of holding back third-graders who do poorly on high-stakes math or reading exams - charging it discriminates and punishes mostly minority students.

"Our position is 'no' on retention. It's punitive and unfair," said Robin Brown, head of the United Parents Association of New York City. "There's been no consultation with parents, teachers, principals or experts."

The parents group, in a resolution, cited research indicating that retention is "highly damaging" to students held back and leads not to higher achievement, but higher dropout rates.

"The practice of widespread retention also has a disproportionate effect on black and Hispanic children . . . and thus has a discriminatory impact."

Even people who generally support higher standards are opposing it. "It takes away discretion from teachers," said City Council Education Committee Chairwoman Eva Moskowitz (D-Manhattan).

In grades 4-8, student promotions are based on attendance and classwork, as well as on results on standardized exams.

NYU Professor Diane Ravitch, long a proponent of tougher standards, also gave a thumbs-down to the policy. "A policy of having 7- and 8-year-olds flunk is draconian," she said.

Bloomberg defended the policy on WLIB radio, calling social promotion an "absolute disgrace."

"People say, 'Well, the child's self-esteem will be hurt if they're kept back.' What about their self-esteem if everybody else in the room is reading and they can't?" he said.

And these failing students get frustrated, the mayor added, and become disruptive. "Let's stop it and teach the kids to read. Third grade is the right grade to do it in because it's the first time we have some tests. . . . Nobody gets hurt this way. Everybody gets helped."

Schools Chancellor Joel Klein also defended the policy. He noted the vast majority of young students doing poorly in the early grades are candidates to drop out or flunk out of high school.

Check back soon


NCLB is up for reauthorization NOW!
Read about it in THIS BOOKLET
Then contact your congressperson


Join the TOFT mailing list:








Music Video: "Not on the Test"
Produced by: Public School Test Records and Grammy Award-winner Tom Chapin

"Keeping Accountability Systems Accountable,"
Martha Foote, Jan. 2007

Schools Cut Back Subjects to Push Reading and Math
Sam Dillon, New York Times

As Test-Taking Grows, Test-Makers Grow Rarer
David M. Herszenhorn, New York Times

Principals Face Review in Education Overhaul
Elissa Gootman, New York Times

"No Child Left Behind: The Test"
Stan Karp, Rethinking Schools

National Education Association:
More information against NCLB.

"Test Question No. 1: Why Have These Tests?"
NYT article on one of Time Out's strongest activists: Jane R. Hirschmann

produced by Naava Katz Design